RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
I believe there is an interesting statistic which shows that sexual crimes are markedly lower in liberal societies than in morally sexually restrictive societies.
There is something about this "unattainable" object of desire, that drives men to sexual criminal activities.
Take away the forbidden novelty and it becomes socially mundane.
unfortunately your being mislead by propaganda in this.
sexual crime is not about sex.
the forbidden novelty of power & control is the issue
45% of all homicides are men killing their female sexual partner
does that make it a sex crime ?
they are killing the caregiver and parent of the children, does that make it a crime against children ?
...
making marriage equal to the power & control mechanism that drives the divide between the self and sexual attainment ?
not really.
it is a false pretense of the ego asserting its own misunderstanding upon a 'natured event' as the observer.
the will to resolve the issue by assigning a polarity to the outside controlled mechanism is common.
vehicle accidents are a good example to use comparative logic.
e.g thought experiment ...
do people blame drunk drivers for speeding ?
desire is for power ?
or
desire is to make another person a victim ?
it is as close to useless discussing the issue with most people as they simply lack the ability to comprehend the science & mostly can only approach the issue from their own narcissistic perspective of wants vs needs
note it is also natural for many as you have done to try and assign the discussion away from parental accountability and into a predatorial rapist debate.
it makes the parents feel like they have escaped being accountable by changing the subject
psychologically it is like a heroin junky.(im not calling you a junky)
anything will do to get the fix to change the subject(illustrating the point not the person, in this case)
even if that means raising a false argument about sex crimes while refering to children to try and illicit a moral demand to change the subject.
it fixes nothing
back to the subject ?
parenting ?
fyi the unobtainable thing is not a male thing
it is a human thing & im not going to discuss it with anyone who is not clinically involved
comparative philosophy of self actualization
psychopathic framing of other humans...
when is it ok to define a person as being not a person so you may deny them human rights ?
Last edited: