John J. Bannan
Registered Senior Member
Are you sure about that? I've seen how primative individuals think, and it is really scary how dumb they are. It seems that enlightenment would be smarter, not dumber.
Are you sure about that? I've seen how primative individuals think, and it is really scary how dumb they are. It seems that enlightenment would be smarter, not dumber.
Enlightenment has little to do with intelligence or the abilities of so-called primitive people.
So what if man is still evolving? How does this explain the evolutionary advantage of a higher state of consciousness?
I understand why you think people choose not to be enlightened. I am asking, well, doesn't the fact that so few people choose to be enlightened evidence the fact that enlightenment does not contain an evolutionary advantage?