Circumcision is a crime now in Germany

Syzygys

Syzygys

As a mother, I am telling you
Valued Senior Member
Even and specially for religious reason:

http://www.rt.com/news/germany-religious-circumcision-ban-772/

"A German court has ruled that parents can’t have their sons circumcised on religious grounds in a move which has angered Muslim and Jewish groups in the country.

The court in Cologne decided that a legal guardian’s authority over a child does not allow them to subject them to the procedure, which the court called minor bodily harm, reports The Financial Times Deutschland.

Neither does religious freedom, which is protected by law in Germany, give grounds for such decisions to be taken for the children, the ruling says."
 
This will conflict with the emerging medical consensus that circumcision is the most effective method discovered so far to halt the HIV/AIDS epidemic. It's been working miracles in Africa. Not circumcising your little boy could be construed as similar to not getting him vaccinated against poliomyelitis: Failure to comply with public health measures.
 
Fraggle Rocker said:
It's been working miracles in Africa.
Click to expand...

I could counter argue, that there is a huge difference between living in empowerished Africa and rich and educated Germany.

Also, if you cut off the breast of young girls, they will never get breast cancer later on. Just think about it for a while...
 
Last edited:
Fraggle Rocker said:
This will conflict with the emerging medical consensus that circumcision is the most effective method discovered so far to halt the HIV/AIDS epidemic. It's been working miracles in Africa. Not circumcising your little boy could be construed as similar to not getting him vaccinated against poliomyelitis: Failure to comply with public health measures.
Click to expand...


updated 5/8/2012 6:21:03 PM ET

WASHINGTON — A pill that has long been used to treat HIV has moved one step closer to becoming the first drug approved to prevent healthy people from becoming infected with the virus that causes AIDS

The Food and Drug Administration said Tuesday that Gilead Sciences' Truvada appears to be safe and effective for HIV prevention. It concluded that taking the pill daily could spare patients "infection with a serious and life-threatening illness that requires lifelong treatment."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...-YDbDQ&usg=AFQjCNFqWzU6o4jNRq9cA7QIaGDUDefCag
 
Syzygys said:
Even and specially for religious reason:

http://www.rt.com/news/germany-religious-circumcision-ban-772/

"A German court has ruled that parents can’t have their sons circumcised on religious grounds in a move which has angered Muslim and Jewish groups in the country.

The court in Cologne decided that a legal guardian’s authority over a child does not allow them to subject them to the procedure, which the court called minor bodily harm, reports The Financial Times Deutschland.

Neither does religious freedom, which is protected by law in Germany, give grounds for such decisions to be taken for the children, the ruling says."
Click to expand...
Horray! This is a fantastic development.
 
Fraggle Rocker said:
This will conflict with the emerging medical consensus that circumcision is the most effective method discovered so far to halt the HIV/AIDS epidemic. It's been working miracles in Africa. Not circumcising your little boy could be construed as similar to not getting him vaccinated against poliomyelitis: Failure to comply with public health measures.
Click to expand...

That's bullshit. Africans don't use fucking condoms. That's like saying the best method to prevent AIDS in Africa is to cover all the men with excrement. Sure, it would work, but it's stupid.
 
Syzygys said:
Even and specially for religious reason:

http://www.rt.com/news/germany-religious-circumcision-ban-772/

"A German court has ruled that parents can’t have their sons circumcised on religious grounds in a move which has angered Muslim and Jewish groups in the country.

The court in Cologne decided that a legal guardian’s authority over a child does not allow them to subject them to the procedure, which the court called minor bodily harm, reports The Financial Times Deutschland.

Neither does religious freedom, which is protected by law in Germany, give grounds for such decisions to be taken for the children, the ruling says."
Click to expand...
Unbelievable. What will the penalty be should these Untermensch insist on circumcising their male children as they have done for thousands of years?

Has this judge conceived of a final solution to the circumcision problem?
 
Good, no one would argue that FGM should be allowed for religious reasons and neither should MGM and BTW mad, CONDOMS are the best method of preventing HIV and it has been shown time after time that whatever protection it gives against the african strain is NOT transferable to the more virulent US strain which has infected the rest of the world
 
Syzygys said:
Also, if you cut off the breast of young girls, they will never get breast cancer later on. Just think about it for a while...
Click to expand...

I thought about it and I increase the challenge: If we prevent all pregnancies there will be no medical problems in the future whatsoever...
 
Very smart move, Germany. Circumcision is one of the most barbaric procedures conceived of. There was never any sense in removing a piece of living, functional tissue that men evolved with for a reason.

Fraggle Rocker said:
This will conflict with the emerging medical consensus that circumcision is the most effective method discovered so far to halt the HIV/AIDS epidemic. It's been working miracles in Africa. Not circumcising your little boy could be construed as similar to not getting him vaccinated against poliomyelitis: Failure to comply with public health measures.
Click to expand...

Your analogy is extremely bad. There's a better way to avoid getting HIV: don't abuse IV drugs and don't have unsafe sex with skanks.

As well, HIV is not an epidemic in Germany and other developed countries.
 
Syzygys said:
Who would have thought that baby foreskin is big business?:

http://voices.yahoo.com/human-foreskins-big-business-cosmetics-201840.html

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/sandiego/article-7356-the-$140-million-foreskin.html
Click to expand...

Indeed, one of the main reasons circumcisions are still performed in the USA is because it's a huge moneymaker for hospitals. It began only a few decades ago, when jewish doctors surreptitiously urged young couples to have the procedure done for the sake of "hygiene."

Those in this thread who have been circumcised (such as madanthonywayne) defend the practice because they don't like thinking of themselves as "damaged goods." Attempting to validate the sick procedure that was done to them is their only way of coping.

Circumcision is also on the decline in the USA. In many states, medicaid no longer subsidizes circumcision, meaning you have to pay for it yourself. People are waking up.
 
Conflating male circumcision with female genital mutilation is stupid. That's why we call it "mutilation," and reject the term "female circumcision" in the first place.

Imputing some kind of penile insecurity complex onto people who are okay with male circumcision is offensive trolling - as is typical of WillNever.

Likewise, WillNever's assertions on the history, prevalence and motivations for circumcision are false and misleading - again, as is typical of his output.
 
Last edited:
WillNever said:
Very smart move, Germany. Circumcision is one of the most barbaric procedures conceived of. There was never any sense in removing a piece of living, functional tissue that men evolved with for a reason.
Click to expand...
Agreed...and well said. Lets hope this intolerance to religious insanity spreads like wildfire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top