I am just saying it's all pretty amazing, a miracle in itself. You don't need the "supernatural" to appreciate what is outside your door.
Oh yes, very pertinent. No, its definition is the fruit of the Oaktree. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/acorn But, pray tell why you are dragging acorns into a conversation of the supernatural? From the story of "Basil and the Magic Acorn"? https://witcher.fandom.com/wiki/Magic_acorn
Well sure, we all use some expressions incorrectly, especially exclamations!....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But a biblical miracle is defined thus; What is the meaning of miracle in the Bible? Miracle | Definition of Miracle at Dictionary.com www.dictionary.com › browse › miracle Just because people use a phrase incorrectly doesn't make it true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle An example of a biblical term of a divine nature and using it in a mundane expression, a poetic license. "Many a time I have witnessed a miraculous sunrise, heralding a renewal of the world". Hmmm... I rather like that....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Sheesh! You want to argue that?Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I'm curious, what did the Netherlands ever do to you?
Just trying to be correct..Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Due to its strategic location, it has one of the richest histories in Europe and a remarkable cosmopolitan population, for a tiny country with a relatively small population. Schooling demands 4 mandatory languages (Dutch, English, German, French) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands My personal history is a condensed version of Dutch history....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Right. In reality, ghosts are misperceptions, artifacts, hoaxes, etc. Like angels and faeries though, ghosts - as a subject matter - are supernatural.
Wonder why nothing is subnatural? why always has to be supernatural? Would a bonsai tree fit subnatural? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Thomas Coleman Younger: The purpose of writing something is usually to communicate something to somebody. Is there something you'd like to discuss, relating to the topic of this thread?
The Bible is nothing More than an Ol' Cryptogram of Math and Physics, reason Lucifer say "y-a-y". Sir Isaac Newton in his "Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John" re-named Two (2) Ol' Metrologists. ______________________________ IOHN: "seven heads, ten horns, and seven crowns" https://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/12.htm seven heads (.0000000), six-one-six (.616), ten horns (x 10), and seven crowns (^-7), and Metrologist (cm^3/g-s^2) tale. gravitation G, the Letter of God, the mark. gravitation John, the Word of God, the name. gravitation G on!, the Sentence of God, the image. gravitation .616 x 10^-7, the Wisdom of God, the number. G = .616 x 10^-7 cm^3/g-s^2 World 1st G measurement. Definitions original "c-g-s" https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/search.php?word=Iohn https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/search.php?word=Iesus IESUS: "seven heads, ten horns, and ten crowns" https://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/13.htm seven heads (.0000000), six-six-six (666.), ten horns (x 10), and ten crowns (^-10), and Metrologist (cm^3/g-s^2) tale. gravitation G, the Letter of God, the mark. gravitation Jesus, the Word of God, the name. gravitation G's us!, the Sentence of God, the image. gravitation 666. x 10^-10, the Wisdom of God, the number. G = 666. x 10^-10 cm^3/g-s^2 World 2nd G measurement. Definitions original "c-g-s" ______________________________ The Bible is nothing More than an Ol' Cryptogram of Physics and Math, reason Lucifer say "y-a-y". IOHN John and IESUS Jesus, just Two (2) Ol' Metrologists. TOM
"Nothing more than"? It's been around for centuries. And it's been written piecemeal by hundreds of people over those centuries. Who do you figure did all this? And how did they coordinate it? And why? I don't expect serious answers to this - just more link spam - but it casts some harsh light on the preposterousness of the idea.