Its because punk changes with every punker. Its different than a lot of genres, as it cant be explained or defined. Its based purely off emotion and individualism
I Its different than a lot of genres, as it cant be explained or defined. Its based purely off emotion and individualism
Maybe it's late, and I'm just tired...But, what's your point Quad?
Are you just saying you prefer Metal to Punk?
Patti Smith. Some of her three-chord numbskull songs like "Ask the Angels" may have been punky, but then you've got stuff like "Poppies," which could have been on a Beatles album.
Talking Heads. Public Image Limited. White Stripes
The Clash. This I really don't get. Acceptably decent singing, fairly sophisticated compositions and good musicianship. Why is this punk?
Green Day. I confess that I still haven't heard anything off of "Dookie," but if a guy can write nice straight-up melodic songs with unobjectionable lyrics like "When September Comes" and "Boulevard of Broken Dreams," what makes him a punk?
Frenzal Rhomb <3
haha..i know those boys!! may or may not have dated one of them...
![]()
![]()
![]()
So jealous haha
I'd highly recommend Dead Kennedys, and Rise Against but I'm not sure you'd quite call them punk. Though if we're going to discuss classification then technically I'm loathed to call anything modern "punk" as it's more seen as an era than a genre, so we're probably talking "post-punk" bands.
As for "pop-punk", I don't like Greenday much, but Blink were quite fun, and at a stretch people seem to include bands like Paramore, Flyleaf, Pretty Reckless. I guess it depends what classification you'd rather stretch.
Agreed to a point. I wouldn't consider anything new to be punk as music has moved on from that era to post-punk, pop-punk, hardcore etc.Green Day is NOT punk...But, I love the Dead Kennedy's..Very much Old School punk.
Often classed as pop-punk. Yes, it's effectively a weak immitation of the original, and was clearly made to bridge the gap between the two classifications. Don't be fooled by the punk addition to the tag, they're not really what you'd consider punk - but they aren't quite pop either.The others you mentioned...As you said, "fun" Not punk though..
Pretty much agreed, I tend to think of the Ramones, Clash, Sex Pistols, Dead Kennedys and other bands of that era.See my list in post #2...Those bands are truly punk...Of course, I left a few good bands out.
Agreed to a point. I wouldn't consider anything new to be punk as music has moved on from that era to post-punk, pop-punk, hardcore etc.
They're all subgenres of the original, and Greenday are generally classed as pop-punk as far as I know.
Often classed as pop-punk. Yes, it's effectively a weak immitation of the original, and was clearly made to bridge the gap between the two classifications. Don't be fooled by the punk addition to the tag, they're not really what you'd consider punk - but they aren't quite pop either.
Pretty much agreed, I tend to think of the Ramones, Clash, Sex Pistols, Dead Kennedys and other bands of that era.
Yep. I do rather love pop-punk and post-punk though. JUST NOT GREEN DAY, no idea why.
Yep. I do rather love pop-punk and post-punk though. Just not Greenday, no idea why.
green day is the best band in the world