Has anybody seen time?
What we could see or perceive are mass, energy, space and their relative movements.
'Time' can be defined as the interval(other than space-interval) between two events. An 'event' can be considered as 'any happening in space'. As nothing is in 'absolute rest', all the things are in some sort of motion. 'Rest' is only a relative concept and not 'absolute concept'. So, we have 'motion' and 'relative motion'.
All our idea of 'time' is from a 'local clock'. A clock is not time. A clock is nothing but mass or energy with a 'uniform motion'. All other motions being compared with this 'uniform motion', gives us an idea of 'time'. So, a clock basically signifies the 'relative motion'. Does 'time' only signify this 'relative motion'?
What we could see or perceive are mass, energy, space and their relative movements.
'Time' can be defined as the interval(other than space-interval) between two events. An 'event' can be considered as 'any happening in space'. As nothing is in 'absolute rest', all the things are in some sort of motion. 'Rest' is only a relative concept and not 'absolute concept'. So, we have 'motion' and 'relative motion'.
All our idea of 'time' is from a 'local clock'. A clock is not time. A clock is nothing but mass or energy with a 'uniform motion'. All other motions being compared with this 'uniform motion', gives us an idea of 'time'. So, a clock basically signifies the 'relative motion'. Does 'time' only signify this 'relative motion'?