When you do come up with something new, sometimes there is no words to describe it. It might still be in that stage, where the OP is looking for the right words and the right descriptions. Give him time.
Do you understand his theories, Robbittybob?
My theory 1 step at a time
- Thread starter Pincho Paxton
- Start date
Do you understand his theories, Robbittybob?
No, I came up with 1 + -1 = 0. It isn't just a row of numbers, its the actual formula to create the universe. It's like binary code. Any computer program can be made from two opposites 1,0,1,0. My maths 1 + -1 = 0 can be used to create any physics in the Universe. I use it in my computer simulations of the Universe creation. That's why my maths is amazing, because its the smallest formula to create the universe from. Particles do not know maths, the Universe does not know maths, a simple system like binary code can be made from particles with holes in them. But this is physical binary code, so you do need to get the results using more code, which is where the = 0 comes into it.
+1 + -1 = binary code : A particle with a hole.
= 0 : Get results. : Particles overlap. Atoms contain Leptons.
12 leptons : The Kissing Problem.
12 - Leptons : The Kissing Problem.
Last edited:
So you came up with it first?
No-one is crediting you with the idea.
You must be annoyed.
What year was it when you first thought of it?
No-one is crediting you with the idea.
You must be annoyed.
What year was it when you first thought of it?
I came up with 'The Theory Of Everything', this part is only stage 1. I'm not annoyed about not getting credit. I'm annoyed that nobody gets stage 2 yet. I should be working with mathematicians to work out the periodic table by now. Because my computer isn't fast enough to run many particles.
Wouldn't your periodic Table look the same as the standard one?
What would you need mathematicians for?
What would you need mathematicians for?
Yes it would look the same, but it would be simulated at the quantum level, which would be useful.
I need mathematicians because the model is a fractal model, so they can find formulas to cut down on excess computer processing. Like E = Mc2. I would never spot that. Once we test reality, we can swap back to formulas.
@PP Get Hansa to explain how the particles have mass first. Once you have mass you are on the way to explain forces between the two masses.
It's a flow force a lot like water, and the particles are like buckets, and around them is a sort of moat. In the middle of the particles, when the water gets there, it vanishes as negative mass, which keeps the bucket empty. The negative mass then escapes as magnetism, or in the Sun.. Neutrinos.
Last edited:
Retrodicted, or predicted?
What's the beach ball?
Can you please show me how your theory predicted this?
The pressure of what is controlled by the brain? This isn't clear to me. Please explain.
Also, as I understand it energy is an accounting system, not a thing that can move anywhere. What is an area of least resistance, as far as energy is concerned?
I don't understand your use of the word "scalar". Please explain what "scale" means and how pressure can be controlled by it.
Why are muscles a "scalar" system? Why are balloons "scalar"? What does a system need to be a "scalar" system?
What does it mean to "scale down" a particle into "negative mass"?
Please tell me how we can detect negative mass particles, and how we can confirm that they have negative mass.
How do holes steer energy?
What is the cosmological constant?
Why does it require a meeting of outward flow?
Outward flow of what, exactly?
Valleys of what? Gaps between what and what?
What, exactly, is a virtual particle?
How can we measure the "real" strength of gravity? Is there any way to show the existence of this "negative force" you mention?
What is the origin of this "negative force"? What equations govern it?
Why don't I feel my ridiculously high weight? If my apparent mass is 70 kg, what is my true mass or weight? How can it be measured? How can it be calculated? Please provide the maths.
What are the bubbles made of?
How can we detect them?
What is the origin of the "weighty force"?
Why does the "weighty force" only operate outside the galaxy? How, exactly, do the bubbles protect us?
Gravity is a flow of what?
Isn't space all around us? How can there be a preferred direction of flow? What is that preferred direction?
Why is the Earth an area of least resistance?
Why would we expect the opposite?
If you cannot provide testable predictions that are clearly backed up by a coherent theory, then all you have is a mess of untestable ideas that are worthless for the purposes of science.
What bubble? Got a link?
What is the kissing problem?
But all experiments seem to show that the nucleus has positive mass. Why?
2004 I predicted the bubbles, I also predicted the Pioneer anomaly before it was made public.
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/2796-gravity-theory/page__view__findpost__p__39517
Scale is a fundamental property of particles. particles must have scale, and scale converts to time. Scale UP causes a bump between particles, scale DOWN removes the bump, slows down time in a clock.
Energy is the release of small particles from a larger particle, it is an overlap hole. When Gravity is forced to overlap it releases energy.
A system needs to be a scale system, because scale causes time, and bump.
Negative mass particles are a hidden by positive mass particles, and we observe the total sum of both particles. So it's hard to find them. Time slowing down is an observation of them. The two slit experiment is an observation of their bow shock. Two objects of a different weight falling in a vacuum is an observation of their compensation of weight. This compensation of weight should also slow down clocks (I don't know if anyone has ever tested it).
The change to the cosmological constant is explained here...
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=111507
A virtual particle is a scale UP from 0.
The origin of the negative force is that zero is made from two parts, mass, and negative mass...
+1 + -1 = 0
You don't feel the weight on you because of the Dark Matter out-flow.
The kissing Problem is here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kissing_number_problem
My predicted bubbles found here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfVbfV79zjw
My bubble Universe theory is old, but was also posted on this site 2009, but note that the beach ball was found 2010, and notice that the members have no idea of what I am talking about, especially AlphaNumeric as usual...
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=97712
Dark matter Beach Ball around Galaxy...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8444038.stm
Hundreds of other links to my predictions are all over the internet.
I found a very early mention of the bubble around the Galaxy from 2007. I call space-time the Aether, and I mistake the Kissing Problem for Hexagons, because the Kissing Problem does create Hexagons...
http://www.theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=103478#p103478
It's funny that in 2007 I call Dark Matter.. ghost. It means that I had never heard of Dark Matter.
Last edited:
Water and buckets are different . Force and mass are also different . You explained creation of a particle or mass from nothing .
What is your explanataion for force ?
How force is created from nothing ?
Why two masses attracts (from your theory point ) each other ?
How do you know that water, and buckets are different if you are still asking me questions?
Force is that positive mass does not easily overlap positive mass. This is because zero particles contain more zero particles. When you try to overlap them exactly it releases virtual particles that are scaled down inside the two particles that try to overlap. These overlaps are based on the kissing problem. An overlap first splits into 6 parts because a direction bump in 2D is 6 (kissing problem... quarks, leptons)
Force is created from nothing by scale.
I have no attraction in my theory. All physics are bumps. But what we see as attraction is negative mass holes. So a magnet creates a virtual hole around itself, and iron filings move into the holes.
One step at a time.
Isn't that what they say at Alcoholics Anonymous?
Isn't that what they say at Alcoholics Anonymous?
I don't know, I have the best brain ever made, so I look after it. I don't drink, I don't even use mobile phones.
Pincho, in your brain the 13th sphere fits perfectly.
Hmmm I have taught you something about the kissing problem at least.
Why do the spheres have to be rigid? They never draw atoms with sphical protons and neutrons that haven't squared themselves at the cojoints.
I like the problem, Pincho.
The 13th Sphere.
Mmmmhhhh.........
It would make a great Title for a Film, with the problem forming part of the plot.
Possibly with De Caprio playing you, Pincho.
(If any film director wants to use this idea, please send me $10)
Yes, a problem that will mean the end of the world, due to the LHC making Black Holes.
Their leader is Alphanumeric. He dismisses anything alternative.
"Only established science has any worth" is one of his sayings.
Walter Wagner, played by Johnny Depp, warns him, but Alpha is sneering....................
"Ye canny invent new laws o' Physics". That's another thing he says a lot.
But now the warnings turn out to be true.
The world has 46 hours before total destruction
They try everything the ordinary scientists come up with, with no success.
At last, in desperation, they turn to a maverick scientist who no-one understands.
(That's you Pincho.)
Alpha has to beg him to help, on bended knees.
(If this takes off, half of the $10 will go to you.)
Last edited:
Why do the spheres have to be rigid? They never draw atoms with sphical protons and neutrons that haven't squared themselves at the cojoints.
Because of equal pressure of the Cosmological Constant. There is the 13th ball lump though, it has been observed by measuring an electron.