My theory 1 step at a time

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Pincho Paxton, Dec 10, 2011.

1. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
There are a lot of repetitive bits aren't there? So short cut them till the final picture.

3. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
I don't really have any bad code.

5. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
Well as I asked yesterday, post a couple of lines of it to show how you have constructed it, please.
How many lines of code and what program is it running in?

7. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
That was a test, it has 50 lines of code. My real version I hope to get down to about 20-40. The first one used vectors as well which is cheating. I need to write it how particles could work, and they couldn't know vectors.

8. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
Particles could have fields around them which would be like knowledge. They would know if something entered their field-space.

9. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
Well, in a spherical field it works that they only have 1 direction to move, so that's what I am thinking about. Limit them as much as possible.

10. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
So you are playing God then! Making up the laws of Pincho Paxton's Universe.

11. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
No, making rules that have no paradox. If a particle has two choices, it has a paradox. If it can only move in one direction it doesn't need to be able to think. Quantum Physics.. remove everything.

12. AlexGLike nailing Jello to a treeValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,304
One thing that's clear is that Pincho's universe does not have any relationship to reality.

13. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
So you think a particle can work out a vector angle? Don't be silly. I need to create the Universe using a method that requires the Universe to have no understanding of physics.

14. AlexGLike nailing Jello to a treeValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,304
And apparently, neither does Pincho.

15. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
Which would be perfect for this job.

16. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
All directions are the same when there is nothing around, as long as it is random.

17. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
Nothing is impossible remember. 1 + -1 = 0. I have them inside a particle. The low value is -1. I think it could be like Blackpool Illuminations, and nothing really moves at all.

Messages:
19,252
False.

19. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
But you have to keep them separate, in other words they are on or in something. But that something has net been created yet.

And the movement implies time existed also.
For it is the other way round you are showing how 0 = 1 + -1 or other words splits into reality. That split implies existence of Maths. and Physical laws for if it was random and unregulated zero could have split a infinite different ways and might not add either.

20. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
he still doesn't understand the Hawking program.

21. Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
What movement? I haven't moved them.. I am working out how they bump. They are in another particle.. zero is infinite. I can put particles inside particles.

22. DywyddyrPenguinaciously duckalicious.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
19,252
Ah, I see you're also incapable of understanding the context of a post.

23. Robittybob1BannedBanned

Messages:
4,199
Well they are stratified or zonal so it is the same thing. There was shifting from one zone to another. That implies design and laws of physics have been written already, you are proving the existence of the creator.