There are a lot of repetitive bits aren't there? So short cut them till the final picture.
My theory 1 step at a time
- Thread starter Pincho Paxton
- Start date
There are a lot of repetitive bits aren't there? So short cut them till the final picture.
I don't really have any bad code.
Well as I asked yesterday, post a couple of lines of it to show how you have constructed it, please.
How many lines of code and what program is it running in?
Well as I asked yesterday, post a couple of lines of it to show how you have constructed it, please.
How many lines of code and what program is it running in?
That was a test, it has 50 lines of code. My real version I hope to get down to about 20-40. The first one used vectors as well which is cheating. I need to write it how particles could work, and they couldn't know vectors.
Particles could have fields around them which would be like knowledge. They would know if something entered their field-space.
Particles could have fields around them which would be like knowledge. They would know if something entered their field-space.
Well, in a spherical field it works that they only have 1 direction to move, so that's what I am thinking about. Limit them as much as possible.
So you are playing God then! Making up the laws of Pincho Paxton's Universe.
So you are playing God then! Making up the laws of Pincho Paxton's Universe.
No, making rules that have no paradox. If a particle has two choices, it has a paradox. If it can only move in one direction it doesn't need to be able to think. Quantum Physics.. remove everything.
So you think a particle can work out a vector angle? Don't be silly. I need to create the Universe using a method that requires the Universe to have no understanding of physics.
Which would be perfect for this job.
All directions are the same when there is nothing around, as long as it is random.
All directions are the same when there is nothing around, as long as it is random.
Nothing is impossible remember. 1 + -1 = 0. I have them inside a particle. The low value is -1. I think it could be like Blackpool Illuminations, and nothing really moves at all.
False.
But you have to keep them separate, in other words they are on or in something. But that something has net been created yet.
And the movement implies time existed also.For it is the other way round you are showing how 0 = 1 + -1 or other words splits into reality. That split implies existence of Maths. and Physical laws for if it was random and unregulated zero could have split a infinite different ways and might not add either.
But you have to keep them separate, in other words they are on or in something. But that something has net been created yet.
What movement? I haven't moved them.. I am working out how they bump. They are in another particle.. zero is infinite. I can put particles inside particles.
Ah, I see you're also incapable of understanding the context of a post.he still doesn't understand the Hawking program.
Well they are stratified or zonal so it is the same thing. There was shifting from one zone to another. That implies design and laws of physics have been written already, you are proving the existence of the creator.