Space time is reality Pseudo

paddoboy said:
That's OK...This is pseudoscience afterall......
And what are you going to do with your proposal now?
Why not contact "mathworld/wolfram.com and inform them of their grave error?
Click to expand...

Can you refute the conclusions?

If not you are trolling.
 
chinglu said:
OK, so you can't defend your statements.

You are a troll.
Click to expand...



Yep, certainly my statements can and have been defended, as has everyone here that is refuting your anti SR/GR position, but your brain seems to be programmed not to accept anything that smells of logic or mainstream views.
Like I said, if the link I gave was false, why not approach them and/or expose them?
And as I have also said, if you had anything at all, reputable, that invalidated SR/GR to any degree, you would not be here....You would have it peer reviewed through the proper channels. You don't need any great prestige.
Why the great man, [Albert Einstein] submitted three papers in 2005, one being SR from a patent office in Bern and he did not have easy access to any complete sets of scientific reference materials, other then being a regular reader of Annalen der Physik.

Science forums are actually scraping the bottom of the barrel for conspiracy nutters, and pseudoscience pushers and is why even at this level, they are excluded from real and proper scientific discussion.
That's not to say that on occasions something good and reliable may not come from it, but certainly not in this particular case. Sorry about that.
 
paddoboy said:
Yep, certainly my statements can and have been defended, as has everyone here that is refuting your anti SR/GR position, but your brain seems to be programmed not to accept anything that smells of logic or mainstream views.
Like I said, if the link I gave was false, why not approach them and/or expose them?
And as I have also said, if you had anything at all, reputable, that invalidated SR/GR to any degree, you would not be here....You would have it peer reviewed through the proper channels. You don't need any great prestige.
Why the great man, [Albert Einstein] submitted three papers in 2005, one being SR from a patent office in Bern and he did not have easy access to any complete sets of scientific reference materials, other then being a regular reader of Annalen der Physik.

Science forums are actually scraping the bottom of the barrel for conspiracy nutters, and pseudoscience pushers and is why even at this level, they are excluded from real and proper scientific discussion.
That's not to say that on occasions something good and reliable may not come from it, but certainly not in this particular case. Sorry about that.
Click to expand...

I am am not seeing your defense.
 
paddoboy said:
As many others have noted, you are being purposely evasive and dishonest.
Click to expand...

I'll do it again.

In a metric space d(x,y) = 0 iff x = y.

Yet on the light sphere, d(x,0) = 0 with the Minkowski metric yet x !- 0.

So, you have it. Space-time is not a metric space.
 
chinglu said:
Space-time is not a metric space.
Click to expand...
Have you informed NASA of this important discovery of yours (that no-one else has been able to figure out)?

I mean, they keep launching space probes and communicating with them (using electromagnetic radiation, aka "light spheres"). You really should tell them.
And make sure they spell your name right.
 
arfa brane said:
Have you informed NASA of this important discovery of yours (that no-one else has been able to figure out)?

I mean, they keep launching space probes and communicating with them (using electromagnetic radiation, aka "light spheres"). You really should tell them.
Click to expand...

We had another pseudoscientific nut on a forum I was on [his name was Zarkov] and when it was asked of him, why he didn't present all his new physics and his cosmological model he called "Spin Gravity " to the establishment, his reply was and I quote, "The world is not ready for my genuise just yet and may never be" :)
 
Last edited:
arfa brane said:
Have you informed NASA of this important discovery of yours (that no-one else has been able to figure out)?

I mean, they keep launching space probes and communicating with them (using electromagnetic radiation, aka "light spheres"). You really should tell them.
And make sure they spell your name right.
Click to expand...

Sure they do. But, they do not use the Minkowski space-time. So, you are lost again.
 
paddoboy said:
We had another pseudoscientific nut on a forum I was on [his name was Zarkov] and when it was asked of him, why he didn't present all his new physics and his cosmological model he called "Spin Gravity " to the establishment, his reply was and I quote, "The world is not ready for my genuise just yet and may never be" :)
Click to expand...

Hey can you prove Minkowski is a metric space?

Otherwise, confess you are a troll.
 
chinglu said:
Hey can you prove Minkowski is a metric space?

Otherwise, confess you are a troll.
Click to expand...

I don't need to prove anything. That onus is on you and as usual in all anti SR/GR threads you have started or participated in, you have failed miserably.
 
chinglu said:
Uh, with much in this thread, can you prove space-time is a valid metric space with continuity?

The answer is no because I proved both are false about space-time.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't, which makes you a liar and a fraud.
Answer the question or slink back into your oblivious state.
 
paddoboy said:
No, you didn't, which makes you a liar and a fraud.
Answer the question or slink back into your oblivious state.
Click to expand...

It is all in this thread and I am not going through it again.

If you can take a post of mine which proves space-time is not a valid metric-space, then go for it.

Further, I have proven this to you now like 5 times and you continue to act like it has not been explained to you.

I do not know what is wrong that you cannot understand the many times it was explained to you.
 
chinglu said:
can you prove space-time is a valid metric space with continuity?
Click to expand...

Can you prove it isn't a "valid" metric space? This would require that you also prove measurement of distances is impossible.

This is going to be very hard to do, since obviously we can measure distances. Even more obviously, you are borderline insane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top