So far, it appears that no one else here has seen the film.
I did, and I thought it did a pretty fair job of presenting an alternate theory compared to mainstream thought. The theory presented may never be accepted by mainstream archeology simply because it would upset so many other current theories. But I will be looking into it more over time. I certainly do not know everything.
It makes perfect "naturalistic sense" to regard the Exodus account as just a story, or a myth, or a legend, as long as there is no naturalistic evidence for it.
The thing is… I do personally think there is naturalistic evidence for the Exodus on the Earth right now. And that evidence is why I think the Exodus account in the Bible is real and accurate. It has become as real to me as any rock I could pick up in my own backyard and hold. I have obviously become very biased at this point.
Time for you to laugh out loud, right about... NOW!
I will attempt to build a case, over time, primarily from satellite imagery and from photographic evidence on the ground and try to explain why I think this.
My bias is Christian. Keep that in mind because that will give you a "good" reason to automatically explain away everything I show you.
And you all can call me crazy now, or you can call me crazy later, or you can call me crazy both now and later if you wish.
There is a bit of material to go over and it will take some time to put it all together, and I work full time, and I have a family, but I will do the best I can with the time I have available.
I regard most of this evidence to be simplistic, and obvious, and even self-evident.
It will not likely be found in any scientific journal, probably ever. And, as far as I know, it is not "peer reviewed" either. That will give you another "good" reason to throw out everything I show you.
All I can do is my best, that is really all I can do.