What evidence would work?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by Crcata, May 17, 2016.

  1. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shakes head)-- for a millionth time now, according to whom?-- whom or what is/are the deciding element?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The jokes on you my reptilian friend!
    You have no genuine questions to side step, and the spin you imagine, is just that Imagination, illusions and delusions.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,311
    The answer is implicit in the OP. (I would have thought it obvious.)

    According to each of "us" as we see fit.
    For many of us, the evidence is just not there.
    For some, they are happy to believe the evidence thus far is compelling.
    Which would be fine - if they didn't try to bring it to a public discussion and try to convince others. Unless they like having their arguments torn apart.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    why are you labeling me this while having a female teenager persona?
    you are delusional on the fact that my questions are being sidestep.
    whom or what is/are the deciding element?
    show how they are not-- simple.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2016
  8. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    so in other words " US(whomever the ffuck they are

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs) ) " is the deciding element for humanity as a whole(whether they are actually correct or not?)?
    again, " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "whom or what is/are the deciding element?"
    none have even, simply, explained why this would even be an extraordinary claim.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs)
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2016
  9. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    you two are simply bandwagon-ing, and seriously do not have any argument nor a clue.

    explain this, why does reality care what 5-7 insignificant individuals on an insignificant site claims ?
     
  10. Sarkus Hippomonstrosesquippedalo phobe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,828
    Krash661, you've been arguing this same strawman, albeit by asking a question, numerous times now and you seem no closer to understanding that no one has said nor implied that which you are suggesting. A number of people have answered your question yet still you seem to think they sidestep. But as has been pointed out to you time and time again, no one is saying that reality does not exist if the public are unsure of it. Reality will continue to be whatever it is irrespective of our understanding of it. Everyone knows this. The question being asked is what evidence would work in terms of being believable I.e. how can we be sure evidence presented is a truthful representation of reality, to the extent that we can believe it.
    Maybe you missed this point? Maybe you didn't and you just enjoy prancing around waving your funny-stick?
    Either way, you have clearly misunderstood that which has been repeatedly said to you.

    And the irony of your claims to be a tier-one scientist working on secret projects, those claims being subject to the same issue (of believability by other people) as this thread is trying to discuss, is not lost on any of us except you, it seems.
    So why not just chug along back to your secret basement lab and continue working on your secret projects? You'll undoubtedly find people there much more receptive to your claims without caring one jot about whether or not you can support them. Amusing as you are, maybe it's time to put you back in the box?
     
    sweetpea and Ophiolite like this.
  11. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    I find it fascinating that someone, such as yourself, so out of touch with reality, feels competent to talk about it.
     
  12. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    "What evidence would work?'

    OK, if some comic plots were based on actual events and you were visited by the superhero in one of those comics and they were alien by birth or something?
     
  13. sweetpea Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,329
    And now you blab away on this site about MK6 and your white hole pictures in your two labs.
    Have you been cleared by MK6 to blab on this site?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 15, 2016
  14. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    There is also the issue that illiterate scientists are not common.
     
  15. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,795
    One of the surest signs that someone does NOT have a security clearance is that they are bragging on an open Internet site about it.
     
  16. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    more hypocritical shenanigans, along with your usual " want-to-be intellect " nonsense, from you?
    whom is " we"-- the public or the individuals in this conversation--which again, we are led back to the " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "whom or what is/are the deciding element?"
    none have even, simply, explained why this would even be an extraordinary claim.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs)
     
  17. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    " caring one jot about whether or not you can support them. "-- except according to whom or what, are they NOT supported?
     
  18. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    please show this to be true-- simple.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shakes head)
     
  19. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    whom or what is to say that this has never happened to anyone?
     
  20. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    " whom or what is/are the deciding element? "-- this is a simple question.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    (shrugs and shakes head)
     
  21. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    more of your clueless ramblings?
     
  22. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    what about the topic?-- is the topic labeled as mock krash?-- i would have assumed that something that is actually intelligent would eventually have came from your mentality at some point. am i wrong, so far it appears so.
     
  23. krash661 [MK6] transitioning scifi to reality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,973
    according to whom though ?--your mentality? and also you cannot comprehend the difference from bragging or mentioning, that or you are simply attempting some kind of hand-waving shenanigans while you pretend that you have a clue of such things, correct?
     

Share This Page