What evidence would work?

agian, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
krash661 said:
except your pathetic opinion is massively insignificant to or anything about me. :) (shrugs)
also how does your pathetic attempts of mocking me help with the topic?
Click to expand...
Why do you keep replying to people you think are insignificant in their opinions and why are you still here on these boards?
I really don't want to know your silly childish replies so your going on ignore.
Your a fantasist.
 
krash661 said:
how do you know for sure-- why do you think a human would not conduct itself from its nature.--odd.
Click to expand...
Because I know such people. Apparently you don't. (Shrugs.)
actually, everyone whined for a serious discussion and i am presenting one
Click to expand...
No, you're not. You are posting insults and lies, hoping for attention. (Shrugs.) And you're getting it, so I guess you have succeeded in your quest. I guess that's what gets you off. (Shrugs.)
 
sweetpea said:
Why do you keep replying to people you think are insignificant in their opinions and why are you still here on these boards?
I really don't want to know your silly childish replies so your going on ignore.
Your a fantasist.
Click to expand...
except your pathetic opinion is massively insignificant to or anything about me. :) (shrugs)
also how does your pathetic attempts of mocking me help with the topic?
 
billvon said:
Because I know such people. Apparently you don't. (Shrugs.)

No, you're not. You are posting insults and lies, hoping for attention. (Shrugs.) And you're getting it, so I guess you have succeeded in your quest. I guess that's what gets you off. (Shrugs.)
Click to expand...
how do i know what you say is true--are you not using that against me?-- hypocritical and contradicting now?
also how does your pathetic attempts of mocking me and your pathetic manipulation spins with baseless accusations that are clear, help with the topic?
and also why would you mock me and then within the same moment turn around and replicate me?--funny
 
agian, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
krash661 said:
agian, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
Click to expand...
You keep repeating this again and again, yet no one here has ever made those assertions.
Maybe you think they have, and maybe you are unable to interpret what people actually say as anything different. Pity. Because deep down inside Krash661 there does seem to be a mildly interesting person dying to get out. But for whatever reason you seem incapable of understanding what people write, and you keep interpreting it as what you want them to be saying rather than what they do say.
If you disagree, and no doubt you will, then provide the examples of where people claim, ever directly or implicitly, what you seem to think they are saying, that reality is dependent upon the certainty or otherwise of the public, or that something is not evidence simply because they say it is not. Where has anyone said it? Point to a post. Show how you have managed to interpret it as you have.

Until then, humourous as your juvenile inanity is, please STFU.
Thanks.
 
Sarkus said:
You keep repeating this again and again, yet no one here has ever made those assertions.
Click to expand...
it appears that you are struggling with what is clearly stated by others.
and once again, i do not understand of what the ridiculing of me pertains to the topic, it appears to be yet another manipulation spin. :) (shrugs)
and you keep interpreting it as what you want them to be saying rather than what they do say
Click to expand...
more hypocritical and contradicting shenanigans on your part?
If you disagree, and no doubt you will, then provide the examples of where people claim, ever directly or implicitly, what you seem to think they are saying, that reality is dependent upon the certainty or otherwise of the public, or that something is not evidence simply because they say it is not.Where
Click to expand...
except i have done so endlessly now, clearly might i add. :) (shakes head)--again, simply another manipulation spin attempt and nothing more. :)
Where has anyone said it?
Click to expand...
simply read and comprehend the many pages. :) (shrugs)
Point to a post. Show how you have managed to interpret it as you have.
Click to expand...
again, except i have done so endlessly now, clearly might i add. :) (shakes head)--again, simply another manipulation spin attempt and nothing more. :)
Until then, humourous as your juvenile inanity is, please STFU.
Click to expand...
awwwe how cute, your endorphins are ruled by your emotions and when you perceive yourself suffering, there must be a chemical release by your emotional disparity.
 
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
krash661 said:
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
Click to expand...
You have been asked, quite reasonably and in line with forum rules, to provide the following: examples of where people claim, (either) directly or implicitly, what you seem to think they are saying, that reality is dependent upon the certainty or otherwise of the public, or that something is not evidence simply because they say it is not.

This is a simple, straighforward, reasonable request. I now insist that you respond to it in a polite, direct and helpful manner. Failure to do so will result in your behaviour being reported. I remind you of the consequences of crossing swords with me last time and advise you to comply with this request and thus follow the rules you agreed to when you signed up to this forum.
 
Ophiolite said:
You have been asked, quite reasonably and in line with forum rules, to provide the following: examples of where people claim, (either) directly or implicitly, what you seem to think they are saying, that reality is dependent upon the certainty or otherwise of the public, or that something is not evidence simply because they say it is not.
Click to expand...
again, except i have done so endlessly now, clearly might i add. :) (shakes head)--again, simply another manipulation spin attempt and nothing more. :)
This is a simple, straighforward, reasonable request. I now insist that you respond to it in a polite, direct and helpful manner. Failure to do so will result in your behaviour being reported. I remind you of the consequences of crossing swords with me last time and advise you to comply with this request and thus follow the rules you agreed to when you signed up to this forum.
Click to expand...
again, except i have done so endlessly now, clearly might i add. :) (shakes head)--again, simply another manipulation spin attempt and nothing more. :)
 
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
Ophiolite said:
You have been asked, quite reasonably and in line with forum rules, to provide the following: examples of where people claim, (either) directly or implicitly, what you seem to think they are saying, that reality is dependent upon the certainty or otherwise of the public, or that something is not evidence simply because they say it is not.

This is a simple, straighforward, reasonable request. I now insist that you respond to it in a polite, direct and helpful manner. Failure to do so will result in your behaviour being reported. I remind you of the consequences of crossing swords with me last time and advise you to comply with this request and thus follow the rules you agreed to when you signed up to this forum.
Click to expand...
please show how i have not--- simple.
do you not comprehend what i have been quoting from others?-- it appears as an "obviously not."
 
Last edited:
" I remind you of the consequences of crossing swords with me last time and advise you to comply with this request and thus "-- :) OH MY --you have now resorted to threatening conduct from your emotional disparity. yeah-- great choice, when your manipulation spins fail, resort to threats, simply because you have no argument --comical.
can i report you for your impersonating as a site authority ?
i am actually interested in your confidence of your threat--funny.
 
Last edited:
again, the argument is simply " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
" " I remind you of the consequences of crossing swords with me last time and advise you to comply with this request and thus " "--funny, i was only banned by posting your pathetic PM to me, publicly.
 
again-- i have been attempting to have a serious discussion here as everyone else continues with their pathetic shenanigans-- it is this simple.
 
again, the argument is only, simply, " if the public is unsure of the reality, then the reality must not exist," and "that is not evidence because I(insignificant individuals of the public only) say it is not. "-- which is only, simply, based on "belief" and NOTHING MORE. :) (shakes head)
 
paddoboy said:
:D
All I see are the rantings and ravings of an impressionable gullible person, who has jumped in to defend an old mate......


http://www.scivillage.com/thread-293.html

It shows krash and MR have been buds for at least nearly two years.
This link is that's site's menu...http://www.scivillage.com/forum-48.html
Click to expand...
ahh--more of the female teenager mentality nonsense that is inaccurate-- comical--is this all pad?
anything on my questions that you have conveniently side-stepped that does not involve your pathetic manipulation spin?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top