DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Ah. The false dichotomy fallacy.If you're not for wise government and the rule of law, then you're for anarchy.
Ah. The false dichotomy fallacy.If you're not for wise government and the rule of law, then you're for anarchy.
No. Meat is only a lust-sustaining obsession. Ask any well-informed vegan. Meat isn't required for life.Meat happens to be a life-sustaining issue,
Letting polluters pollute and making all restraints against pollution entirely voluntary is madness of the highest order.Ah. The false dichotomy fallacy.
It is currently a life-sustaining issue.No. Meat is only a lust-sustaining obsession.
Those polluters are currently providing you with food, shelter, a job and an internet connection.Letting polluters pollute and making all restraints against pollution entirely voluntary is madness of the highest order.
Society has a moral right to be informed and to decide between the Climate Apocalypse and healthy eating.Taking any measure that might result in more difficult access to meat is political suicide, and a class issue.
Another reference to the first demon's message. "Job creators" should be coddled and free of all moral restraints and existing monopolies are to be preferred over easily-implemented green technologies.Those polluters are currently providing you with food, shelter, a job and an internet connection.
You would have a stronger stance of you didn't attempt to put words in your opponent's mouths.Another reference to the first demon's message. "Job creators" should be coddled and free of all moral restraints and existing monopolies are to be preferred over easily-implemented green technologies.
What's wrong with informing society and letting them decide between subsidizing the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry or in slaphappily accepting the predicted Climate Apocalypse? Your claim that if all humans decided to be vegans to help save the planet in a significant measure, that it would cause "global collapse, poverty, hardship and starvation" is just plain silly.It's one thing to say something should stop, it's entirely another to figure out how, without causing global collapse, poverty, hardship and starvation.
The first demon's message is extraordinarily prevalent. And it's only to your shame for insisting to be uninformed and not recognizing it.You would have a stronger stance of you didn't attempt to put words in your opponent's mouths.
You personally are the same as the other billions of people who want everyone else to give up what they've acquired.
I'm all for letting society decide between a rollback of the industrial age with an end of transportation versus continuing to subsidize the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry.Maybe we should just "get rid of" transportation too. After all, we can walk.
I think there are too many humans.I'm all for letting society decide between a rollback of the industrial age with an end of transportation versus continuing to subsidize the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry.
Nothing at all. Who said anything was wrong with informing people? But informing is not what you've been advocating for in this thread.What's wrong with informing society and letting them decide between subsidizing the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry or in slaphappily accepting the predicted Climate Apocalypse?
OK, so that wasn't just a one-off remark.This is a religious battle for you.The first demon's message
You are living off the avails of those you call thieves. That makes you a thief-by-proxy and a hypocrite.Yes, I suspect that there are billions of sentient beings that recognize that fairness should apply to everyone equally and that there is justice in requiring thieves to return all their ill-gotten gains with substantial penalties.
They are making that decision. For the most part, they are choosing meat over rollback.I'm all for letting society decide between a rollback of the industrial age with an end of transportation versus continuing to subsidize the environmentally catastrophic meat, dairy and egg industry.
As the Cowspiracy documentary makes clear, society isn't allowed to make an informed decision since all the recognized environmental organizations only present a rollback of the industrial age as the only way to avert the Climate Apocalypse.They are making that decision. For the most part, they are choosing meat over rollback.
You don't know diddly-squat about my job.You are living off the avails of those you call thieves.
The Cowspiracy documentary is very informative. And you have opposed the message contained therein with dishonest quibbles.Who said anything was wrong with informing people? But informing is not what you've been advocating for in this thread.
For starters, I propose that enlightened minds work together to inform society of the important information contained in the two videos I posted.I am out of ideas so what is your plan exactly?
It's also a religious battle for the climate alarmists. The major difference is that my religion exalts justice and truth and their religion is deeply rooted in hypocrisy and deceit.This is a religious battle for you.
Try handing out pamphlets at MacDonalds that could work.For starters, I propose that enlightened minds work together to inform society of the important information contained in the two videos I posted.