No, exactly as we all have been telling you.
Is Nibiru confirmed to exist?
- Thread starter Saint
- Start date
Which is nonsense
Yes confirmed when and after it had been observed.
Planet 9 is purely hypothetical at this time, and no observation has ever been recorded.
And of course there was a lot more evidence for Pluto then this Planet 9, which if it exists, is way out beyond the known planets, and hence its effects are slight and mostly as modeled computer simulations.
They may very well be in error on this.
And much the same type of evidence was used to posit the existence of Vulcan. And that turned out to be wrong.What's your point?
Planet-9 is not hypothetical pad , the planet is out there , where it is ...should actually not hard to find . but it will be found , no ddoub't.
Don't be crass dyr.
He doesn't have a point.
This is just his typical carrying on and denial when he is shown to be in error. It happens everytime. [and that's often]
According to you at least.
To actual scientists it's still only a possibility.
I'm being factual - and learn how spell my name.
He doesn't have a point.
[and that's often]
I do , you just don't like the conclusion
And really, its no use arguing with him. As I said earlier, someone that has been so deeply impressionable with beliefs in anything and everything that smells of woo, is in total and inane denial of the facts of science, if those facts happen to invalidate the woo.
Why wouldn't I like the conclusions river?
What possible reason would I have to not want the conclusion to be reached, if at all they could observe it?
You are not making any sense river.
I don't expect you to make sense pad .
Scientist know their stuff pad. especially nowadays . where there is evidence , the object is sure to follow.
Please river, show us any NASA article, or any other reputable article, where it says Planet 9 has been observed and confirmed.
Can't
But there is evidence .
I agree scientists know there stuff. The problem is you do not.
You are heavily weighed down with your woo agenda, which has you now claiming things that have never been claimed.
Evidence can be wrong. Dywyddyr has already given you an example of that.
Scientists also know that we have no evidence for Aliens or Aliens having ever visited the Earth. They are right there also.
Evidence is not observation.
Evidence maybe misleading and/or wrong.
Non-sequitur
I have a quibble. Observation is evidence, not the reverse.
Saint has no evidence, or it would have posted links.