Islam vs. the Western World: off-topic posts from a Religion thread

Since when has it been acceptable to lump a mishmash of different religions, cultures and languages into a single-minded entity?
Clearly you have little to no knowledge of 'Western Civilisation', DiamondHearts.

And for your information, most people do not support the wars in the Middle East. Protesters in London have been camping outside Buckingham palace for several years in order to bring attention to this fact.
And what about the women and children killed in terrorist attacks in Britain and America? What had they done to deserve such reckless hatred?
 
When I go through some of these threads it does look as if there is a brow beating job being done on anyone who acknowledges themself as muslim. They are being asked to blame 'islam', their own religion, for the actions of a few. We would never ever ask an Israeli to acknowledge a flaw in judaism to explain their actions in Gaza anymore than we would blame christianity for the actions of nazi's and attitude towards people of color, its ridiculous dangerous even. If this is representative of attitudes between east and west or islam vs. non we are going to be living in a dangerous world for a very long time and the outcome is not necessarily in favor of the West.

Thats pretty much a succint expression of what pisses me off about the bigots running loose here. :rolleyes:
 
Because there were no private armies of Koreans and Japanese murdering their own citizens and allied soldiers.

Sorry, not sure what your links are meant to promote. Maybe you could state it clearly.

Thats something that only Muslims do, or Arabs or <insert demonised group of the moment>

It is? Why do you say this?

Wilsonizer has written on the difference between Japan and Iraq, post war. Its woefully inadequate but from a western point of view, makes very specific points.

http://wilsonizer.blogspot.com/2006/03/post-war-iraq-and-post-war-japan.html

This is almost exactly what I said, Sam. Did you read my post at all?
 
Thats pretty much a succint expression of what pisses me off about the bigots running loose here.

And yet it's exactly the same as how you blame all of the Jews and the USA for all of the Palestinian problems.

What say you, SAM?

I'd also like to ask why, if Muslims seem to hate and blame the west for all it's problems, why do Muslims keep blowing up Muslims? More Muslims are killed by other Muslims than all the westerners combined. Does that makes sense to Muslims? Or do they blame THAT on westerners, too?

Baron Max
 
He did say "all Western individuals... should leave immediately." And if you follow DH's posts, you'd know he meant everyone, not just troops.

Yup. DH is a classic example of a reactionary religious bigot. His small word slip illustrates his attitudes: it's not the troops even so much as it's a loss of "islamic territory". Let's all keep in mind this is the same guy that had no problem with beheading apostates.

Sam is actually similar: earlier on in a debate, she opined that non-muslims who didn't like living in an islamic country should just leave. Sam whines about bigots making inferences about Arab/muslim attitudes, but she and DH seem to represent that reactionary element of islam that causes all the problems. A small reactionary element can cause hardship out of all proportion to its size. Or: you don't always need a majority.
 
..., but she and DH seem to represent that reactionary element of islam that causes all the problems. A small reactionary element can cause hardship out of all proportion to its size. Or: you don't always need a majority.

Yeah!! Have you been following the riots and protests of a very small, but violent, few Muslims in Pakistan lately? They're yelling of "revolution" as they smash windows and burn buildings and throw rocks at the police in Lahore.

Only a small, violent, reactionary few people are probably going to cause the downfall of the Pakistani government as we know it ...and that was recently installed by democratic vote.

So, .....should we view those few Pakistani Muslims as the majority of Pakistani Muslims????? If not, how can they overthrow the duly-elected government???

Baron Max
 
Q: Of course, when the children of Muslim parents grow up in westernized nations, they begin to question the customs and cultures of their heritage, and often revolt in favor of those lifestyles.

Well I know a Pakistani woman who was raised partly in Pakistan and Malaysia, went to university in the U.K and is presently working as a psychologist in Cambodia. From the looks of her she could be from NY, she doesn't wear a hajib, she can drink alcohol and even smokes cigarettes at a party but she doesn't see herself as 'in revolt' nor would she deny being 'muslim'. Any suggestion of that would make her cringe in the same way a Jewish person would think someone a moron for expecting them to adhere to kashrut and telling them they are somehow in 'revolt' or questioning their culture and its customs; some do some don't but those who dont are still considered 'jewish' are they not? Or better yet its like thinking a catholic is somehow revolting against tradition by using birth control, we never expect a woman who calls herself catholic to be a 'staunch catholic'. All of a sudden if a muslim woman wearing a dress and heels in a western environment is 'revolting against customs and tradition' when in her eyes she is just being a modern muslim woman.

Q: US foreign policies are not the same as the conflict between the Islamic state and Westernized lifestyles. Muslim here often make that mistake as they blame the west for their own internal problems and shortcomings.

U.S foreign policy has brought about a clash of religion. Where do you find a conflict between the Islamic State and western lifestyles? And in those examples what would that have to do with you as a westerner who does not live in those States? How does these conflicts affect you? The fact that western policies have presently and historically created internal problems within much of the muslim world is so well documented I don't know how anyone can deny them. Maybe if we left them alone long enough and treated them fairly they wouldn't have an excuse not to focus on those issues and would, given their own time, organically find ways of addressing their own problems.

Geoff: Sam is actually similar: earlier on in a debate, she opined that non-muslims who didn't like living in an islamic country should just leave.

Big Difference!! Diamonds is quoted as saying all non-muslims should be forced to leave muslim countries without a context. Sam is suggesting that if a non-muslim doesn't like living in an islamic country then they should just leave. Now what could be wrong with that? How is that a similar opinion to that of Diamond? In the U.S they used to say 'Amercia love it or leave it'. I prefer to live in Asia because the USSA pisses me off so much that I prefer to simply leave it.
 
Last edited:
U.S foreign policy has brought about a clash of religion. Where do you find a conflict between the Islamic State and western lifestyles? And in those examples what would that have to do with you as a westerner who does not live in those States? How does these conflicts affect you? The fact that western policies have presently and historically created internal problems within much of the muslim world is so well documented I don't know how anyone can deny them. Maybe if we left them alone long enough and treated them fairly they wouldn't have an excuse not to focus on those issues and would, given their own time, organically find ways of addressing their own problems.

You're really blaming US Foreign Policy? The Islamic world has been at war with European powers for thousands of years. Sometimes advantageously successful, other times becoming capitulated. The US' involvement doesn't prove to show any variation in the historical war.
 
Yes I do. When it comes to present day events such as Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan I absolutely blame American foreign policy.

The European and Islamic powers? You must mean the Ottomon Empire right? Or do you mean the crusades? Which clash would you like to tackle first because I don't find either examples as having as long-term damage as what has been taking place for the past few years, in other words I think we have made things much much worse for others and ourselves.
 
So it's still about trying to lay the blame on the west? It seems that's all that Muslims know and care about ...rather than pick themselves up and get on with life.

It would be helpful if the West acknowledged some blame.

Just so you know, the people of America were oppressed from the 1700s, yet were able to go on and become the world's greatest military and social society on the planet. And we didn't do it by wallowing in the blame of the British.

1. After the British, there were no further invasions by foreign nations.
2. Greatest military and social society on the planet? LOL. Your jails are full. Your banks are bankrupt. Your citizens are living on food stamps. Your last President trashed science and promoted superstition. etc.

People all over this planet have been oppressed at one time or another, yet Muslims still wallow in blaming others while doing little or nothing to pick themselves up and get on with life.

Perhaps if the invasions and political meddling in the ME could cease, the Muslims would have a chance.

And worse that all that ...Muslims are killing other Muslims all over the planet in suicide attacks. And even for that, Muslims blame the west??? Why?

Yawn. Here is a plan. Get out of Afghanistan, get out of Iraq, get out of Pakistan, stop defending and arming Israel, stop sanctioning Iran and other ME states, free the alleged enemy combatants languishing under detention without trail, in Gitmo and elsewhere, and lets see if this changes?

Blame, blame, blame ..... "Johnny made me do it!" Hardly seems like a good reason to blow things up, does it? ...especially your own people!

The US of A has a LOT to answer for cowboy.
 
It would be helpful if the West acknowledged some blame.
The US of A has a LOT to answer for cowboy.

Yep, ain't it interesting? That the USA could make all those things happen in all those countries, even with all of the people against it and hating the USA all the time?

See how powerful the USA is? We can make people do things that they don't want to do!! :D

Baron Max
 
Yes I do. When it comes to present day events such as Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan I absolutely blame American foreign policy.

Isn't it interesting .....that the USA is so powerful that it can cause whole nations to fall into dire poverty and militant violence with just a few policies from the government? ...even while all those people hate the USA? Wow, we're pretty damned powerful, ain't we?

I take that to mean, conversely, if we just change a policy or two, we can turn those nations into wealthy, powerful nations ....with just a change in policies? Wow, we're damned powerful, ain't we?

Baron Max
 
Yep, ain't it interesting? That the USA could make all those things happen in all those countries, even with all of the people against it and hating the USA all the time?

Why exactly do you think there IS such blatant hatred towards the US from these folk?

See how powerful the USA is? We can make people do things that they don't want to do!! :D

That is called Imperialism. The world has already swung from Unipolar (USA) to Multipolar.

Obama is attempting to initiate damage control. Too little, too late. The movie is over cowboy. :D
 
Why exactly do you think there IS such blatant hatred towards the US from these folk?

Because we have things that they don't. Because we're more powerful than they are. Because we have wealth while they wallow in dire poverty and hunger and disease. In short, they're jealous of us.

Obama is attempting to initiate damage control. Too little, too late. The movie is over cowboy. :D

Typical radical Muslim response. President Osama holds out his hand in surrender, yet you radical Muslims will do nothing but spit in it.

Vengeance, it seems that that's all that Muslims know and that's all they'll even know. And in the end, they'll be nothing and have nothing.

Baron Max
 
Because we have things that they don't. Because we're more powerful than they are. Because we have wealth while they wallow in dire poverty and hunger and disease. In short, they're jealous of us.

I would say that in combination with the colonialism and oppression we have/are doing to them. I agree if we did not or never did fuck with these people they would still complain, but we did and it provides a legitimate excuse for them to complain.
 
Because we have things that they don't. Because we're more powerful than they are. Because we have wealth while they wallow in dire poverty and hunger and disease. In short, they're jealous of us.

Where does this bizarre notion that the "American Way" is what everyone wants come from?

Typical radical Muslim response. President Osama holds out his hand in surrender, yet you radical Muslims will do nothing but spit in it.

Obama is doing NOTHING concrete, YET.

Vengeance, it seems that that's all that Muslims know and that's all they'll even know. And in the end, they'll be nothing and have nothing.

You speak about vengeance. It is not the Muslim world that is invading sovereign nations my friend. It is not the Muslim world that has 1000 military bases in 150 countries. It is not the Muslim world that has spent the GDP of the next 3 US generations in farcical wars of absolutely no merit or reason. :)

Shalom
 
You speak about vengeance. It is not the Muslim world that is invading sovereign nations my friend. ...

No, it's about Muslims killing Muslims by the thousands ...practically every fuckin' day somewhere in the world. Muslim suicide bombers; Muslim gun attacks; Muslims throwing acid; Muslims destroying schools; Muslims beating women; Muslims not letting women go to schools; ....., and a whole host of nasty things that Muslims to do other Muslims.

Then sometimes that idiotic violence spills over onto civilized nations of the world and it pisses us off!

Baron Max
 
Back
Top