just me
Registered Senior Member
no matter how silly a being you may be, you can understand anything, the universe or otherwise, if you have a method of figuring out things that can not not to be the case, and that method is logic.
Should science replace religion?
- Thread starter wegs
- Start date
no matter how silly a being you may be, you can understand anything, the universe or otherwise, if you have a method of figuring out things that can not not to be the case, and that method is logic.
Disagree
Logic is based on knowledge then reasoning .
If any of these two are wrong , then the logic is wrong .
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
typo ?
If you get rid of science, you can't obtain knowledge.
How far would you go? Is there some other method for gaining knowledge?
What knowledge have we gained from the paranormal, exactly? How have we put this knowledge to use?
So, one side we have science that has provided us with massive libraries of knowledge that keep growing everyday and used in countless applications across all avenues of human and physical endeavor, and on the other we have the paranormal that has provided the knowledge that "it can affect things".
I think you've discovered the reason why we can't use any knowledge from the paranormal and why it is useless as a tool for gaining knowledge.
Then, if people experience the paranormal, what knowledge are they gaining from it? What do we now know that we didn't know before? Anything?
What exactly is the "More" to life? What is the non-physical form?
Then, why isn't that common knowledge? Why has life been explained without the need of invoking a spirit? Why hasn't such a thing ever been shown to exist?