Write4U:
You have done nothing on them! I have done it all!
What have you done? You have cut and paste a bunch of random snippets from articles whose content you mostly don't understand. You have, in addition, made a whole bunch of lofty claims, none of which you have managed to support with evidence or any kind of coherent argument.
But at this point in time, the real problem is the endless boring useless
repetition of the same talking points, over and over,
ad nauseam. You're a one-track broken record, Write4U, apparently incapable of doing anything except regurgitating the same two or three ideas over and over, never making any progress and never learning anything new.
I'm sorry to see that
this is what you've become over the past few years.
Oh, and you make that decision for everyone else here?
Everyone else here who engages with you has told you, themselves.
But, in case you forgot, I am an Administrator here. That means that, yes, I
do get to make decisions about the kind of content we want to platform here. Haven't you noticed? Maybe try reading some threads other than the ones you start. Take an interest in what
else happens on this forum. Your single-minded focus on spinning that random wheel and selecting one of the only three topics listed on it has led to an unhealthy fixation.
Did you just find this out?
The numbers you are so curious about are the references to the various sources and authors.
Which you do not cite. More problematically, you do not always identify the
original source you cut and pasted, either. Plagiarism, like you found out, is trying to pass off somebody else's words as if they are your own. You need to take more care to avoid doing that.
It is you who is committing prejudicial censorship without any knowledge of the subject. You are remaining willfully ignorant.
You forgot your 3000+ post thread on the topic of microtubules again.
Are you telling me that, in that thread with more than 3000+ posts, you didn't provide me with any knowledge of one of your three favorite subjects?
Your goal in starting that thread, which no doubt you have forgotten, was to try to show that microtubules are the seat of consciousness. You utterly failed to do that, in a conversation containing 3000+ posts. You made the
claim repeatedly, but you could never put together a coherent brief of evidence in support of your claim. You still can't. Personally, I don't think
anybody can prove your claim, as things currently stand. There are lots of speculations and lots of claims out there, but no smoking gun evidence.
Don't be too hard on yourself. Penrose and Hammeroff are way more qualified to talk about this subject than you are, but they've both failed to deliver the goods on the microtubules, too.
I dare say that at this stage I know more about microtubules than you do and I am telling you that you are resisting peer reviewed science.
Don't be silly, Write4U. After
years of discussion, you still don't know what a mathematical function is, what a differential equation is, how to use the word "quantum" correctly, or what any of that complicated biochemistry stuff you cut and paste actually means.
Your idea of knowledge of a topic amounts to knowing how to ask google or Copilot to dig up pages with the term "microtubule" in them. At best, you have a superficial memory of some buzz words, although you don't know what most of them mean.
Your behaviour is a bit like that of a person who claims to know all about ballet dancing because he has watched a few ballets on TV and he managed to google a list of ballet terms from wikipedia ("
pas de deux", "jette" etc.) But he has never had a single dance lesson, never stood on a stage let alone danced on one, has rarely, if ever, had a discussion with a professional ballerina and, if he has, he actually understood about one in every three words that was said about ballet.
Your disinterest doesn't bother me in the least. I don't post for your pleasure.
It's for sheer bloody-mindedness, at this point, isn't it?
I post for general distribution and discussion.
Ah yes. Distribution. Unfiltered distribution. Like endless junk mail.
Let me remind you that my posts usually draw spirited debate because the content is controversial and merits closer examination.
Mostly, your posts attract people who, with good intentions, are trying to help you by (a) correcting your many errors and/or (b) teaching you some science. But nothing sticks with you. You apparently can't remember what
you posted yesterday, let alone something that somebody told you three days ago. These days, you're even struggling to maintain a coherent line of thought even in the course of a single post. By the time you get to the end of a post, you've forgotten where you started. At least, that's what it looks like to me.
I can understand the need for separate threads lest the the OP becomes unwieldy, but I have never heard anyone say Gravity is dead because it has been discussed to much, too frequently in a single thread.
In our posting guidelines, it says that we reserve the right to reject contributions on topics that have already been widely canvassed in previous discussions.
Discussions about gravity that go around in useless circles have been closed in the past, just like your microtubule thread was closed. Probably you forgot again, or weren't paying attention in the first place.
Instead we engage in endless debates about semantics instead of content. Booooringgggg!!!
When you use words incorrectly, the discussion almost inevitably becomes about semantics. What else would you expect?
Yes, I know. It's a real drag to be expected to use scientific terms correctly, and all that. It's much more fun and it requires much less effort when you just make up your own meanings as you go. Much less boring.
But,
you chose to try to talk about science on a science forum. Probably a bad choice of forum for you. A free-form stream-of-consciousness blog would probably suit you better. Certainly, it would be much less restrictive on your creativity. Nobody would read it, though. There's the rub. You thrive on feedback, don't you? Any response to your nonsense give you that dopamine rush - even when the response is overwhelmingly critical of what your wrote. So, in the end, the content becomes irrelevant. All that you need is for people to keep responding.
You're not fooling me when you claim that this endless repetition bores you. It is your life blood. You thrive on it.
I am distributing scientific NEWS about conditions at previously unaccessible levels of observation.
Everything you post is in service to your two or three core religious beliefs, which at this point go something like this:
1. Abstract mathematics somehow cause changes in physical systems.
2. Microtubules somehow explain consciousness.
3. Bohm, Tegmark and Hammeroff should be recognised as the gods they are. All Glory to the Church of the Implicate Order!
This forumm and specifically this sub-forum is not dedicated to a particular school of thought that excludes all other science.
The particular subforum in which this thread is currently housed is dedicated to "General Philosophy". However, you haven't actually discussed the thread topic for some time now. There's no philosophy here, other than the regular repeat of Bohmian or Tegmarkian mysticism - both of which are more akin to religion.
As far as sciforums as a whole goes, you really ought to read the introductory paragraphs in our Site Posting Guidelines. Have you ever read them? If so, have you forgotten them? They talk about the aims and philosophy of the site as a whole, in succinct terms.
You have already relegated nano-scale science to "pseudo-science"...
Telling lies is unhelpful, Write4U. You should stop that nonsense.
I have at no time referred to "nano-scale science" as pseudoscience. The hint is right there in the label.
Your pseudo-religious nonsense is not nano-scale science.
