The Perfect Clock

Asexperia said:
You aren't interested, but 2,514 views say the opposite since October 18.
Click to expand...
You do realize that, from a glance, it appears the bulk of those views are the same few of us here that are trying to explain to you why you are wrong, yes?

Just because I see the shit Donald Trump does, that doesn't mean I agree with him... you do understand this concept?

Granted, at this point, you are making it abundantly clear you are not here for discussion, but rather to soapbox.
 
There is no perfect clock , simply because we have no explores in deep space .

Inotherwords , even atomic clocks are based on what we understand as movement between one moment to another . By electrons
 
THE MEASURE OF TIME

To measure time, two tools are required:

1- A periodic phenomenon, like the movements of the Earth and clocks.
2- The chromnesia or temporary memory.

With no chromnesia we would only think of the present. Because of chromnesia, older people think in decades or even centuries. But Physics only considers the use of clocks.

In the chromnesia we relate the different units and periods of time.

We measure the past time (duration) and we project this measure into the future.

The most accurate clocks would not be useful if we did not have chromnesia.
 
Asexperia said:
THE MEASURE OF TIME

To measure time, two tools are required:

1- A periodic phenomenon, like the movements of the Earth and clocks.
2- The chromnesia or temporary memory.

With no chromnesia we would only think of the present. Because of chromnesia, older people think in decades or even centuries. But Physics only considers the use of clocks.

In the chromnesia we relate the different units and periods of time.

We measure the past time (duration) and we project this measure into the future.

The most accurate clocks would not be useful if we did not have chromnesia.
Click to expand...

Your posting is crap

But let's examine how much you understand the crap you are posting

Because of chromnesia, older people think in decades or even centuries

So at at which age does a young person who doesn't think of decades or even centuries start thinking about said decades or even centuries?

Asexperia said:
But Physics only considers the use of clocks.
Click to expand...

When did Physics get contemplative?

The most accurate clocks would not be useful if we did not have chromnesia

Oh I think they would. But let's tip toe into the cuckoo world a little distance. What does chromnesia add to the most accurate clocks to make them useful?

Consider your item 2/ states 2- The chromnesia or temporary memory which if I understand that statement would indicate you think adding temporary memory to the most accurate clocks would make them useful

I would venture all manufacturers of GPS equipment would disagree

I await for you to enlighten me if I am mistaken

:)
 
In the others magnitudes (length, temperature, mass, etc,) only
is required that the observer verifies the measure (in the instrument).
 
Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be
affected for the speed and gravity. Time wouldn't be relative
if they used a perfect clock.

I am waiting for the construction of the perfect clock.
 
Last edited:
Asexperia said:
Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be
affected for the speed and gravity. Time wouldn't be relative
if they used a perfect clock.

I am waiting for the construction of the perfect clock.
Click to expand...

So all that is needed to disprove Physics is a perfect clock

Who knew it would be so easy

How many Scientists are working on building a perfect clock and what will it be made of?

And how precisely will the Scientists measure its perfection? when it will need to be measured against something that is already perfect?

So what is already perfect against which the perfect clock can be compared?

:)
 
Last edited:
Asexperia said:
Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be affected for the speed and gravity.
Click to expand...
Correct - just as every other process that depends on time is affected.
Time wouldn't be relative if they used a perfect clock.
Click to expand...
Yes, they would. A perfect clock measures time perfectly in its own reference frame. That is not the same as measuring time perfectly in other reference frames. They are all different, and depend on the speed of the frame.
I am waiting for the construction of the perfect clock.
Click to expand...
OK. You will be disappointed when that perfect clock works like all our other (nearly perfect) clocks.
 
Asexperia said:
Current clocks use a frequency or vibration that can be
affected for the speed and gravity
Click to expand...
Correct and all future clocks will also be affected by speed and gravity.
Current and future rulers are also affected by speed and gravity.
 
Asexperia said:
You aren't interested, but 2,514 views say the opposite since October 18.
Click to expand...
The count could be that high because (as in my case) people are just dropping by to chuckle at your silliness, not because they are interested.
 
origin said:
Correct and all future clocks will also be affected by speed and gravity.
Current and future rulers are also affected by speed and gravity.
Click to expand...
If humanity never reaches the limits of GR and quantum theory, yes. So, you are so pessimistic that there will never be found a new, more fundamental theory?
 
The vibrations of the turbines of an airplane affect clocks, not time.

A change in time is, for example, 10 seconds in the past or
10 seconds into the future. Clocks of the GPS are always in the present.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top