Why do theists reject evolution?

Write4U said:
Have you any idea of how fast science is evolving?
That is exactly what Hazen demonstrates. Three years ago.
A%2BNetwork%2BDiagram%2Bfor%2B403%2Bcarbon%2Bminerals.png

A network diagram for 403 carbon minerals reveals previously hidden patterns in their diversity and distribution.
https://hazen.carnegiescience.edu/press-release-08012017

Mineralogy is now also using the statistical models of "Large Number of Rare Event" (LNRE) distribution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_number_of_rare_events
Click to expand...

Your not a master of summarising are you?

Hint none of us are here to be fast track Scientists

PS not left to do nothing yet just finishing up my overnight load

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Me see me like does not work in Science
Click to expand...
I thought science was build on "me see, me like, me read, me confirm, me was correct" ...celebration man..
Michael 345 said:
Presentation of your baubles is your downfall
Click to expand...
Not if you read my links.
Michael 345 said:
Your not a master of summarising are you?
Click to expand...
I let the scientists speak for me. What better summations than by actual scientists? They are the ones with knowledge of proofs and "acceptable" narratives.

I have said many times before. "Me see, Me like" is from reading the science, not from doing the science.
 
Last edited:
↑
Me see me like does not work in Science
Click to expand...

I thought science was build on "me see, me like, me read, me confirm, me was correct" ...celebration man..
Click to expand...

I understand the confusion ;

Science is about ego , I get your point .

Science in the end though is about Truth .
 
Last edited:
river said:
↑
I understand the confusion ;
Click to expand...
You have shown many times that you rarely understand. What is even worse, even when you do understand, you stupidly reject out of your paranoia re mainstream science.
river said:
Science is about ego , I get your point .
Click to expand...
More ignorant crap. Your own ego is something to behold, when you make so many ignorant statements without support or links.
And of course the probable greatest of all Einstein was a very humble man.
river said:
Science in the end though is about Truth .
Click to expand...
Science is about knowledge through observation and experiment and models.
It's your own truth that is in question river, every time you set foot in this forum, you display anything and everything but truth.
 
paddoboy said:
You have shown many times that you rarely understand. What is even worse, even when you do understand, you stupidly reject out of your paranoia re mainstream science.

More ignorant crap. Your own ego is something to behold, when you make so many ignorant statements without support or links.
And of course the probable greatest of all Einstein was a very humble man.

Science is about knowledge through observation and experiment and models.
It's your own truth that is in question river, every time you set foot in this forum, you display anything and everything but truth.
Click to expand...

pad knows better .
 
Write4U said:
I thought science was build on "me see, me like, me read, me confirm, me was correct" ...celebration man..
Not if you read my links.
I let the scientists speak for me. What better summations than by actual scientists? They are the ones with knowledge of proofs and "acceptable" narratives.

I have said many times before. "Me see, Me like" is from reading the science, not from doing the science.
Click to expand...

I'm out

Obviously my attempt to explain the nuances of your style of presentation is beyond my ability

Good luck with not pissing off to many other posters before you look in the mirror and ask yourself

"COULD IT BE ME?"

:)
 
Write4U said:
I thought science was build on "me see, me like, me read, me confirm, me was correct" ...celebration man..
Not if you read my links.
I let the scientists speak for me. What better summations than by actual scientists? They are the ones with knowledge of proofs and "acceptable" narratives.

I have said many times before. "Me see, Me like" is from reading the science, not from doing the science.
Click to expand...

I'm out

Obviously my attempt to explain the nuances of your style of presentation is beyond my ability

Good luck with not pissing off to many other posters before you look in the mirror and ask yourself

"COULD IT BE ME?"

:)
 
Two post the same??????

Hint WHO IS IT REPLYING TO

I had considered posting 10 but thought could be a tad excessive

The future holds the answer if two will be sufficient

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
"COULD IT BE ME?"
Click to expand...
Well, I am not going to change my thought processes and research habits because it pisses some people off. It reminds me of my elementary school days.

IMO, I present a well ordered argument along with examples of scientific proofs that form the basis on which I rest these arguments. If people refuse to examine the evidence or are unable to follow my logic, there is nothing I can do about it.

Victor Borge exemplifies'

But rest assured;
It'll never be me that starts with the "prejudicial" and "degrading" ad hominems.

IMO, that stops all productive exchanges before they even have a chance to develop.
 
Last edited:
Michael 345 said:
I'm out

Obviously my attempt to explain the nuances of your style of presentation is beyond my ability

Good luck with not pissing off to many other posters before you look in the mirror and ask yourself

"COULD IT BE ME?"

:)
Click to expand...
Some time ago I predicted that eventually Write4U would find himself talking to river and no one else!
It seems to be gradually coming true. But maybe he's happy with that. I suppose it's better than talking to your cat.

Just. :D
 
exchemist said:
Some time ago I predicted that eventually Write4U would find himself talking to river and no one else!
It seems to be gradually coming true. But maybe he's happy with that. I suppose it's better than talking to your cat.

Just. :D
Click to expand...

You ol' Notradamous you

Well as per my Signature my cat is a Scientist

Curiosity did not kill the cat
It made the cat a scientist

Must get him published one day

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
productive exchanges from ever starting
Click to expand...
No, I present a productive argument. Sometimes it's the respondent who fails to present a constructive response and resorts to gutter style character assassination. I don't care how well educated a person is, if he/she is unable to offer a cogent argument in a civilized manner, I don't need their input. Nothing lost as far as I am concerned.

OTOH, if there is a problem with content (not style) of my propositions, a simple question for clarification is all that is necessary for me to develop my argument in greater detail or example, or amend the facts where that is appropriate.

river and I have diametrically opposed views, but our exchanges are civil and informative, and that counts in my book. It aids in the establishment of an informed citizenry on both sides.
 
Last edited:
Michael 345 said:
Obviously my attempt to explain the nuances of your style of presentation is beyond my ability
Click to expand...
Obviously.

Try correcting my proposition as to the facts where appropriate, not the writing style in which I present my proposition. Now, that would be productive, imho.

This is not an English composition class. You want to critique my command of the English language or writing style, start a thread in "literature". I'd be very interested to see where my communication fails in composition and delivery. I used to make a living at it.....:)

Remember the OP question. Do you disagree with my position?
 
Last edited:
river and I have diametrically opposed views, ✓ OK

but our exchanges are civil ✓ OK

and informative, ? that would presume information was actually informative to the other person - helps if said other person understands said informative information

and that counts in my book.✓OK

It aids in the establishment of an informed citizenry on both sides. ? again depends if the information is actually informative and presumed to be flowing into a understanding receptacle

(context - girlfriend is slow retuning from cooking our meals at her food court so I have a few spare moments to fill, but I really am out :) )

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
river and I have diametrically opposed views, ✓ OK
but our exchanges are civil ✓ OK
Click to expand...
and informative, ?
that would presume information was actually informative to the other person - helps if said other person understands said informative information
Click to expand...
Of course, but as long as the other person continues to ask for additional information, I must assume that the person is at least "interested". And that's all I can ask for. It allows me to expand on my original posit and clarify any ambiguity in presentation.
and that counts in my book.✓OK
It aids in the establishment of an informed citizenry on both sides. ?
again depends if the information is actually informative and presumed to be flowing into a understanding receptacle
:)
Click to expand...
Again true, but as long as there is expressed interest, why should I create a problem where apparently there exists none?
I am certainly not going to reject anyone who wishes to enter in a civil discussion about a subject in which
I AM INTERESTED.......:cool:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top