We don't have a choice in the matter. We all come from the same stuff and we all return to the same stuff.To the best of my awareness, I have no desire to be "one with all." I find such a desire to be absurd, and not something to aspire for.
We don't have a choice in the matter. We all come from the same stuff and we all return to the same stuff.To the best of my awareness, I have no desire to be "one with all." I find such a desire to be absurd, and not something to aspire for.
...When your brain finally dies, and you still exist, then the joke is on you.
No, there out there. Just Google "near death experiences of hell". Good trip vs. bad, I suppose.
We don't have a choice in the matter. We all come from the same stuff and we all return to the same stuff.
No, there out there. Just Google "near death experiences of hell". Good trip vs. bad, I suppose.
Why? It represents cooperation, acceptance, and love. Possibly promoted by a shared fate or desire for life itself to continue.
I categorically oppose the idea of taking people's experiences that they had when ill, dreaming, on drugs or in other forms of trauma, as somehow grounds to believe in heaven, hell, God, angels, or any such thing that is typically considered as "spiritual."
A spirituality based in any way on dreaming, drugs, disease and distress is a sick spirituality.
I would use the experiences due to dreaming, drugs, disease and distress neither as evidence for, nor against spirituality.
If a spirituality is to be legitimate, it has to be arrived at by means that seem reasonable, actionable.
And if a criticism of spirituality is to be legitimate, it has to be arrived at by means that seem reasonable, actionable.
It represents no such thing.
If all is one, then there can also be no cooperation, no acceptance, and no love, since, if all is one, there are no individuals who could cooperate, accept eachother, or love eachother.
Do you realize that by saying "in vast marjority of cases" you are using a perceived statistic? So you are using a statistic to prove that statistics are unreliable. Awesome. Just Awesome.
True, that's statistics, but the reason why I don't believe in statistics when it comes to testing something for example, is because it doesn't count all the factors, it could or it couldn't be, when something it's too foggy, than it cannot be considered serious method for proving disproving something. In this case you're playing with apples and oranges.
For not caring, you're doing a fine imitation of it.
No, because 'those people' that we know exist don't match your description.
You mean other people, that no one knows about that do match your description.
He was psychic?Again wrong, just a while an russian solved a 100 year old problem in mathematics, they offered him million dollars and teaching on prestige faculties, and he refused them all and told them leave me alone.
http://theoriginalwinger.com/2010-0...100-year-old-problem-then-turns-down-1m-prize
http://techland.time.com/2011/05/03...ld-problem-then-refuses-million-dollar-prize/
Well generally, I have seen you reject any evidence presented as invalid if it presents any reasonable argument against your claims. And the only evidence you are left with repeating is that it is what you say it is because you say so, of course you disguise it as something else every time and rework the words when you are called on it. As far as I am concerned you are no longer worthy of discussion. My evidence for that is because I believe it is true. The same evidence you give for the existence of life after death. Hey if the evidence of belief is valid for the afterlife then it is valid to prove your insignificance as well.
The only evidence you represent is that you 100% reject the possibility of alternatives working, which is close-minded. I'll rather trust to my experience than laboratory tests, which use statistical holes (and let's be honest they don't prove anything, you can easily say people in these experiments are frauds) I have more than enough experience to tell that science is not always right when it comes to alternatives treating, but alternative alone cannot solve the problem, this is why I keep saying first classic medicine, and when nothing is left go to try alternatives in every possible way.
He was psychic?
We know mathematicians exist. That's all fine and all but where are the psychics?
Goofy stuff. So, you say, try the regular medicine, but if it doesn't work, try homeopathy. Your open mind needs a good screen door to keep the bugs out.
The only evidence you represent is that you 100% reject the possibility of alternatives working, which is close-minded. I'll rather trust to my experience than laboratory tests, which use statistical holes (and let's be honest they don't prove anything, you can easily say people in these experiments are frauds) I have more than enough experience to tell that science is not always right when it comes to alternatives treating, but alternative alone cannot solve the problem, this is why I keep saying first classic medicine, and when nothing is left go to try alternatives in every possible way.
And give me one reason why I shouldn't try homeopathy (or anything else) after nothing from classic medicine helps, you obviously want to die, if classic medicine doesn't help you have nothing to lose.
I don't understand such thinking.
You cannot trust science every single word it says, because this is multi-billion worth business, not science anymore. Scientists test what they want to test and that's it. You as the individual has the final word, not science.
You trust your experience and we will trust ours. Is that fair? It seems you want us to trust YOUR experience. Sorry that isn't going to happen. I have more than enough experience to know that perceptions are not everything. And that the human mind is fuckign amazing and can entertain itself in a myriad of ways. But I don't expect you to understand that. I don't want you to. I want you to go on living with whatever beliefs give you hope and sense of purpose so that you can be a functional human being.
But if you put your ideas out here as fact, we will tell you what we think of your ideas just as you are free to tell us what you think of ours. If you don't like being laughed at, stay quiet. We all run the risk of ridicule when we post here. If you can't take it. Piss off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWE1tH93G9U
Homeopathy costs money, troop. Why burn it? Even if dying, you can find a more productive use for it.